An interest in "previous band history" and the psychology of it

This is a topic that has been on my mind probably forever, but I never really thought about making a topic about it until now. When I was a kid and I first got deep into VK, one thing that definitely played a role in my interest in going deeper and deeper was my interest in band histories. Think for instance something like Vocals: Mao (Ex. SELFRUSH → SADIE (ć‚µćƒ‡ć‚£) → Sadie , → The THIRTEEN , → Sadie , The THIRTEEN). That kind of thing.

Some reasons why band histories interested me was that:

1: I usually enjoyed the past bands of band members A LOT, it seems like musicians are often more boisterous, angsty and passionate when they’re just starting their careers, but they don’t have to skillset to take that passion to its fullest yet.

2: For novelty value. Having rare sought-after bands can have a nice ā€˜feeling’ to it, especially when newer to that whole thing. I don’t know if this seems selfish or goes into the whole ā€œhoardersā€ mentality but it’s something many of us can probably relate to on some level.

3: Appreciating the ā€œindie soundā€. I feel like early/preliminary bands have a less refined and more offhand sound which appeals to me and this somewhat fits into 1 regarding the less refined bit.

4: Guessing what to expect. This sounds a bit counter productive to an earlier point but part of my enjoyment in preliminary bands is that I can look into the member’s band histories and guess what kind of awesome sound I might expect when I hear them. I’m often right!

I think we all have different reasons for being interested in band member’s previous bands but I’m curious what everyone elses experiences/perspectives are with this!

6 Likes

I think it’s a pretty self evident way of discovering new bands. If you have a musician you like for whatever reason (talent, style, hotness :slight_smile: ) it makes sense if you want to see what else they’ve been in. You can also see how much they improved (or didn’t) over the course of their career, especially in the case of singers. I only got into VK some years ago, but I used and still use databases like vkgy (or visual ioner back then) to explore bands this way.

2 Likes

I do look into the band history sometimes and I like it if I discover that a member was in another band I know. But I don’t really like to look into their past projects. Probably because I prefer to get into new artists when they are still active.
I understand the appeal of getting ā€œrareā€ stuff but I also find it frustrating if it’s hard to get and I find it kind of sad when I already know, they won’t be making new stuff.
But if a bands disbands I like to look into the new projects of the members, tho. Seem I am more of a forward person. :sweat_smile:

1 Like

I would also like to bring up something else that I thought of, which is that some musicians seem to ā€˜evolve’ when they join new bands. Thinking again of Mao from Sadie who went from this bright pop sound:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZtBGXW5f9I to this darker sound: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdoryhf4PXU

Surely the musicians you play with play a huge role in your own development as a musician, which seems to be the case with many musicians in VK. The label of course plays a large role in that change as well.

1 Like