So I’m aware this thread might be slightly controversial, but I feel it’s an important discussion to have… or at least I’m actually very curious what people think to give myself some sort of peace of mind.
I’ve noticed that Visual Kei (VK) singers often face criticism for their vocal style, sometimes being described as ‘bad’ or even compared to a goat or wounded animal. Funny enough, much of this criticism comes from within the VK fan community.
As someone who is passionate about VK and sings it, I have an appreciation for the stylish and emotive qualities of VK vocals. But while I also sing in other styles, VK holds a special place in my heart. However, I get the impression some fans have this attitude that VK (Especially the ‘rare’ bands within the scene) just plain suck but are fun to listen to anyway… essentially making VK about to be some sort of guilty pleasure.
From my perspective as a singer, I think it’s much more complicated.
While it’s true that many lesser-known VK singers from the mid-2000s and earlier may not have been very polished singers, which especially shows during live performances, the level of vocal skill in the VK indies scene has DEFINITELY improved in recent years.
Even then, I think what makes a singer good or bad is so much more complex than many people realize. Singing is a form of artistic expression and I value not just technical skill, but also the ability for a singer to color a room with their voice, and tell a story through the rhythm. You don’t have to be able to belt like Mariah Carey, or sing with grit like Dave Grohl to be able to showcase unique vocal skill.
Ultimately, everyone should just enjoy the music they love of course, regardless of others’ opinions. I just hope if people decide to weigh in their opinions this thread can foster a civil and productive conversation. ^^